NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M vs ATI Radeon HD 5750
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M and ATI Radeon HD 5750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 93% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 72% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 86 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1207 vs 1164
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4119 vs 992
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.121 vs 7.384
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.105 vs 0.679
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2837 vs 1757
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2837 vs 1757
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 vs 13 October 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 86 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1207 vs 1164 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4119 vs 992 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.121 vs 7.384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.105 vs 0.679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2837 vs 1757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2837 vs 1757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3347 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750
- Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 16.1 billion / sec
- 3.8x more pipelines: 720 vs 192
- Around 94% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 518.4 gflops
- 3.7x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 337 vs 253
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 460.31 vs 391.548
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.118 vs 18.548
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.346 vs 32.965
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2124 vs 1699
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2124 vs 1699
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 16.1 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 720 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 518.4 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 vs 253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 460.31 vs 391.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.118 vs 18.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.346 vs 32.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2124 vs 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2124 vs 1699 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | ATI Radeon HD 5750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1207 | 1164 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 337 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4119 | 992 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.121 | 7.384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 391.548 | 460.31 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.105 | 0.679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.548 | 23.118 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.965 | 53.346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1699 | 2124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2837 | 1757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1699 | 2124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2837 | 1757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3347 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | ATI Radeon HD 5750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF106 | Juniper |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 | 13 October 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1229 | 1230 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 720 |
Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion / sec | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 86 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,040 million |
Boost clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Length | 178 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
AMD Eyefinity |