Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
Comparative analysis of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 45 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 58 vs 43
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 May 2010 vs 9 April 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 55 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 58 vs 43 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 32 vs 4
- 26.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 161 vs 6
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Pipelines | 32 vs 4 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 161 vs 6 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6 | 161 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 58 | 43 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1687 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | PowerVR SGX5 | Tesla |
Code name | GMA 600 | G96C |
Launch date | 1 May 2010 | 9 April 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1575 | 1578 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $59.46 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.88 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 4 | 32 |
Floating-point performance | 72 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Transistor count | 314 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |