Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs AMD Radeon HD 6450

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4000 and AMD Radeon HD 6450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 750 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 198
• Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 119
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 1.878
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 vs 97.327
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 vs 0.231
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.36 vs 4.982
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 vs 497
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 810
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1627
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 497
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 810
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1627

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6450

• Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• 10x more pipelines: 160 vs 16
• 6x better floating-point performance: 200.0 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 633 vs 538
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.314 vs 12.009

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6450

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	347 198
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 119
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	538 633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.712 1.878
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	155.638 97.327
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.931 0.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.36 4.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.009 19.314
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	754 497
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1492 810
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 1627
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	754 497
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1492 810
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 1627

Compare specifications (specs)