Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 4000

NVIDIA GeForce 210

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 4.2 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 126
6.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 30
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 497
3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 688
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 497
3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 688

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	14 May 2012 vs 12 October 2009
Texture fill rate	4.2 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	347 vs 126
PassMark - G2D Mark	194 vs 30
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1492 vs 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2392 vs 688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1492 vs 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2392 vs 688

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210

2.2x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 650 MHz
Around 17% better floating-point performance: 39.36 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 30.5 Watt vs 45 Watt
4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2438 vs 538

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1402 MHz vs 650 MHz
Floating-point performance	39.36 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30.5 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	2438 vs 538

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

347

126

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

194

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

538

2438

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1492

497

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2392

688

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1492

497

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2392

688

Name	Intel HD Graphics 4000	NVIDIA GeForce 210
PassMark - G3D Mark	347	126
PassMark - G2D Mark	194	30
Geekbench - OpenCL	538	2438
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1492	497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2392	688
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1492	497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2392	688
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 4000	NVIDIA GeForce 210
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 7.0	Tesla 2.0
Code name	Ivy Bridge GT2	GT218
Launch date	14 May 2012	12 October 2009
Place in performance rating	1501	1674
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$29.49
Price now		$32.99
Value for money (0-100)		6.81
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz
Core clock speed	650 MHz	1402 MHz
Floating-point performance	33.6 gflops	39.36 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	16	16
Texture fill rate	4.2 GTexel / s	4.16 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	30.5 Watt
Transistor count	1,200 million	260 million
CUDA cores		16
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
Height		2.731" (6.9 cm)
Length		6.60" (16.8 cm)
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	11.1 (11_0)	10.1
OpenGL	4.0	3.1
Memory
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	64 Bit
Shared memory	1
Maximum RAM amount		512 MB
Memory bandwidth		8.0 GB / s
Memory clock speed		500 MHz
Memory type		GDDR2
Technologies
Quick Sync
CUDA