Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 753 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 171
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 5.332
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 vs 0.635

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

• 9x more pipelines: 144 vs 16
• 7.5x better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 551 vs 347
• 4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2520 vs 538
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 205.545 vs 155.638
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.932 vs 7.36
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.728 vs 12.009
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 800 vs 754
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 vs 1492
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 vs 2392
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 800 vs 754
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 1492
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 vs 2392

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	347 551
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 171
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	538 2520
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.712 5.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	155.638 205.545
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.931 0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.36 10.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.009 22.728
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	754 800
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1492 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	754 800
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1492 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 2418

Compare specifications (specs)