Intel HD Graphics 4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 4000

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
Environ 39% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 753 MHz
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 versus 171
Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 versus 5.332
Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 versus 0.635

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	14 May 2012 versus 22 March 2012
Vitesse augmenté	1050 MHz versus 753 MHz
Processus de fabrication	22 nm versus 40 nm
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	194 versus 171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.712 versus 5.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.931 versus 0.635

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

9x plus de pipelines: 144 versus 16
7.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 253.4 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
Environ 29% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 45 Watt
Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 551 versus 347
4.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2520 versus 538
Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 205.545 versus 155.638
Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.932 versus 7.36
Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.728 versus 12.009
Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 800 versus 754
Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 versus 1492
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 versus 2392
Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 800 versus 754
Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 versus 1492
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 versus 2392

Caractéristiques
Pipelines	144 versus 16
Performance á point flottant	253.4 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt versus 45 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	551 versus 347
Geekbench - OpenCL	2520 versus 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	205.545 versus 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	10.932 versus 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	22.728 versus 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	800 versus 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1833 versus 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2418 versus 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	800 versus 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1833 versus 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2418 versus 2392

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

347

551

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

194

171

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

538

2520

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.712

5.332

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

155.638

205.545

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.931

0.635

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.36

10.932

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.009

22.728

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

754

800

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1492

1833

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2392

2418

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

754

800

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1492

1833

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2392

2418

Nom	Intel HD Graphics 4000	NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
PassMark - G3D Mark	347	551
PassMark - G2D Mark	194	171
Geekbench - OpenCL	538	2520
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.712	5.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	155.638	205.545
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.931	0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	7.36	10.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	12.009	22.728
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	754	800
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1492	1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2392	2418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	754	800
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1492	1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2392	2418
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel HD Graphics 4000	NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 7.0	Fermi 2.0
Nom de code	Ivy Bridge GT2	GF116
Date de sortie	14 May 2012	22 March 2012
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1501	1451
Genre	Laptop	Laptop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1050 MHz	753 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	650 MHz
Performance á point flottant	33.6 gflops	253.4 gflops
Processus de fabrication	22 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	16	144
Taux de remplissage de la texture	4.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	35 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,200 million	1,170 million
Noyaux CUDA		Up to 144
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Résolution VGA maximale		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Soutien de bus		PCI Express 2.0
Taille du laptop		large
Soutien API
DirectX	11.1 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.0	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit
Mémoire partagé	1	0
RAM maximale		1 GB
Vitesse de mémoire		1800 MHz
Genre de mémoire		DDR3
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus