Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 116 Watt
| Launch date | 14 May 2012 vs 15 March 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 116 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 6.9x more texture fill rate: 28.8 billion / sec vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 192 vs 16
- 20.6x better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1557 vs 347
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 vs 194
- 10.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5750 vs 538
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.461 vs 8.712
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.392 vs 155.638
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.125 vs 0.931
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.511 vs 7.36
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 41.941 vs 12.009
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 vs 754
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 vs 1492
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3322 vs 2392
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 vs 754
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 vs 1492
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3322 vs 2392
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 billion / sec vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 33.6 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 vs 347 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 vs 194 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5750 vs 538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 vs 8.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 vs 155.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 vs 0.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 vs 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 vs 12.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 vs 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 vs 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 vs 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 vs 2392 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 | 1557 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | 382 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 538 | 5750 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 | 18.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 | 354.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | 1.125 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | 18.511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | 41.941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 | 2488 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 | 2488 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 3322 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 322 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Ivy Bridge GT2 | GF116 |
| Launch date | 14 May 2012 | 15 March 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1501 | 1019 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $287.59 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.49 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 33.6 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | 28.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 116 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,200 million | 1,170 million |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 98.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1026 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
