Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 980 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 170 Watt
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 24.4x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- 84x more pipelines: 1344 vs 16
- 73.2x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
- 15.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 vs 347
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 vs 194
- 28.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15511 vs 538
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.613 vs 8.712
- 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 971.208 vs 155.638
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.281 vs 0.931
- 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.404 vs 7.36
- 7.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 86.208 vs 12.009
- 9.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 vs 754
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 1492
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 2392
- 9.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 vs 754
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 1492
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 2392
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 33.6 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 vs 347 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 vs 194 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15511 vs 538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 vs 8.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 vs 155.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 vs 0.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 vs 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.208 vs 12.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 vs 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 vs 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 2392 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 | 5345 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | 537 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 538 | 15511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 | 41.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 | 971.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | 4.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | 40.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | 86.208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 1839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Ivy Bridge GT2 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 14 May 2012 | 10 May 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1501 | 554 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Price now | $474.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 33.6 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,200 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 4000 with others
IntelHD Graphics 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 550M
IntelHD Graphics 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M
IntelHD Graphics 4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 3000M
IntelHD Graphics 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M
IntelHD Graphics 4000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7480D
IntelHD Graphics 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
