Intel HD Graphics 4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 4000

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000

Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 980 MHz
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
3.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 170 Watt

Vitesse augmenté	1050 MHz versus 980 MHz
Processus de fabrication	22 nm versus 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt versus 170 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

Environ 51% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 650 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.5 billion / sec versus 4.2 GTexel / s
84x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 16
73.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,459.5 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
15.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 versus 347
2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 versus 194
28.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15511 versus 538
4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.613 versus 8.712
6.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 971.208 versus 155.638
4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.281 versus 0.931
5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.404 versus 7.36
7.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 86.208 versus 12.009
9.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 versus 754
2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 versus 1492
Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 versus 2392
9.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 versus 754
2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 versus 1492
Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 versus 2392

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	980 MHz versus 650 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	102.5 billion / sec versus 4.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1344 versus 16
Performance á point flottant	2,459.5 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	5345 versus 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	537 versus 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	15511 versus 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	41.613 versus 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	971.208 versus 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.281 versus 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	40.404 versus 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	86.208 versus 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7038 versus 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3686 versus 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 versus 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7038 versus 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3686 versus 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 versus 2392

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

347

5345

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

194

537

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

538

15511

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.712

41.613

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

155.638

971.208

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.931

4.281

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.36

40.404

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.009

86.208

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

754

7038

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1492

3686

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2392

3361

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

754

7038

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1492

3686

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2392

3361

Nom	Intel HD Graphics 4000	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
PassMark - G3D Mark	347	5345
PassMark - G2D Mark	194	537
Geekbench - OpenCL	538	15511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.712	41.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	155.638	971.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.931	4.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	7.36	40.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	12.009	86.208
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	754	7038
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1492	3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2392	3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	754	7038
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1492	3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2392	3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	1839

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel HD Graphics 4000	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 7.0	Kepler
Nom de code	Ivy Bridge GT2	GK104
Date de sortie	14 May 2012	10 May 2012
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1501	554
Genre	Laptop	Desktop
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$399
Prix maintenant		$474.99
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		13.20
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1050 MHz	980 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	650 MHz	980 MHz
Performance á point flottant	33.6 gflops	2,459.5 gflops
Processus de fabrication	22 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	16	1344
Taux de remplissage de la texture	4.2 GTexel / s	102.5 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	170 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,200 million	3,540 million
Noyaux CUDA		1344
Température maximale du GPU		97 °C
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI		Internal
Soutien de G-SYNC
HDCP
HDMI
Résolution VGA maximale		2048x1536
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Soutien de bus		PCI Express 3.0
Hauteur		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Longeur		9.5" (24.1 cm)
Options SLI		3-way
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires		Two 6-pin
Soutien API
DirectX	11.1 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.0	4.2
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	256-bit GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	1
RAM maximale		2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire		192.2 GB / s
Vitesse de mémoire		6.0 GB/s
Genre de mémoire		GDDR5
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA