Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 4.6 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 20 vs 16
• Around 37% better floating-point performance: 46 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 524 vs 347
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 194
• 4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2143 vs 538
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 vs 0.931
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.084 vs 7.36
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 817 vs 754
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 2392
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 817 vs 754
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 2392

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• Around 86% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 7.844
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 vs 154.696
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.009 vs 8.335
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 1381
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 1381

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	524 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	275 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2143 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.844 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	154.696 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.958 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.084 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.335 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	817 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1381 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3044 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	817 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1381 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3044 2392

Compare specifications (specs)