Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.844 vs 2.907
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 vs 0.475
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.084 vs 7.65
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 September 2013 vs 24 April 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 vs 2.907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 vs 0.475 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 vs 7.65 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 14 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 192 vs 20
- 7.3x better floating-point performance: 336.0 gflops vs 46 gflops
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 182.993 vs 154.696
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.19 vs 8.335
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2029 vs 1381
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2029 vs 1381
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 875 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 14 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 20 |
| Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops vs 46 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.993 vs 154.696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.19 vs 8.335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2029 vs 1381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2029 vs 1381 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 | 2.907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | 182.993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | 0.475 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | 7.65 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.335 | 18.19 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 | 2029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 | 2029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 4400 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Kepler |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 3 September 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1421 | 1514 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 46 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.6 GTexel / s | 14 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 4400 with others
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7560D
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8350G
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
AMDFirePro S4000X
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K620M
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
NVIDIAGRID M40
