Intel HD Graphics 4400 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4400 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4400
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.844 versus 2.907
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 versus 0.475
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.084 versus 7.65
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 3 September 2013 versus 24 April 2012 |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 versus 2.907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 versus 0.475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 versus 7.65 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
- 2.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 875 MHz versus 350 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 14 GTexel / s versus 4.6 GTexel / s
- 9.6x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 20
- 7.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 336.0 gflops versus 46 gflops
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 182.993 versus 154.696
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.19 versus 8.335
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2029 versus 1381
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2029 versus 1381
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 875 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14 GTexel / s versus 4.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 versus 20 |
Performance á point flottant | 336.0 gflops versus 46 gflops |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.993 versus 154.696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.19 versus 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2029 versus 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2029 versus 1381 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 | 2.907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | 182.993 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | 0.475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | 7.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.335 | 18.19 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 | 2029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 | 2029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 4400 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 3 September 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1421 | 1514 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 875 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 46 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 20 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.6 GTexel / s | 14 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 392 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.51 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |