Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 65% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 33 Watt
• Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 152
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.844 vs 5.055
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 vs 0.635

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

• 4.8x more pipelines: 96 vs 20
• 5.5x better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 46 gflops
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 532 vs 524
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2387 vs 2143
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.004 vs 154.696
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.393 vs 9.084
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.903 vs 8.335
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 967 vs 817
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 vs 1381
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3044
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 967 vs 817
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 vs 1381
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3044

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	524 532
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	275 152
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2143 2387
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.844 5.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	154.696 215.004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.958 0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.084 10.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.335 19.903
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	817 967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1381 2766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3044 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	817 967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1381 2766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3044 3359

Compare specifications (specs)