Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs AMD Radeon HD 6670

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and AMD Radeon HD 6670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 800 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 66 Watt
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 247
• Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 vs 1905
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 vs 4.861
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 0.463

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6670

• 3.8x more texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
• 24x more pipelines: 480 vs 20
• 15.4x better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 50 gflops
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 724 vs 630
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 235.463 vs 171.17
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.918 vs 10.385
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 38.551 vs 12.361
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1564 vs 988
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3260 vs 1702
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 2808
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1564 vs 988
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3260 vs 1702
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 2808

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6670

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	630 724
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	314 247
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3210 1905
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.844 4.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	171.17 235.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.115 0.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.385 15.918
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.361 38.551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1702 3260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2808 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1702 3260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2808 3348

Compare specifications (specs)