Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 vs 532
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 152
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 vs 2387
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 vs 5.055
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 0.635
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 988 vs 967
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 988 vs 967

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

• 4.8x more pipelines: 96 vs 20
• 5.1x better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 50 gflops
• Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.004 vs 171.17
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.903 vs 12.361
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 vs 1702
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2808
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 vs 1702
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2808

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	630 532
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	314 152
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3210 2387
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.844 5.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	171.17 215.004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.115 0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.385 10.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.361 19.903
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1702 2766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2808 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1702 2766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2808 3359

Compare specifications (specs)