Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 versus 532
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 versus 152
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 versus 2387
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 versus 5.055
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 versus 0.635
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 988 versus 967
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 988 versus 967
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 versus 22 March 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 versus 532 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 versus 152 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 versus 2387 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 versus 5.055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 versus 0.635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 versus 967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 versus 967 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- 4.8x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 20
- 5.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 253.4 gflops versus 50 gflops
- Environ 36% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.004 versus 171.17
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.903 versus 12.361
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 versus 1702
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 2808
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 versus 1702
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 2808
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops versus 50 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 versus 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.393 versus 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 versus 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 2808 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 532 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 152 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 2387 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 5.055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 215.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 10.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 19.903 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 2766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 2766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1359 | 1390 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 392 million | 585 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3\GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||

