Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 980 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 149
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 vs 157.479
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 0.864

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

• 2x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 3.1x more texture fill rate: 15.68 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
• 19.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 20
• 15.1x better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 50 gflops
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 793 vs 630
• Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3866 vs 3210
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.392 vs 8.844
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.101 vs 10.385
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.77 vs 12.361
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1589 vs 988
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3235 vs 1702
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 2808
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1589 vs 988
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3235 vs 1702
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 2808
• Around 78% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 345 vs 194

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	630 793
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	314 149
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3210 3866
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.844 9.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	171.17 157.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.115 0.864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.385 16.101
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.361 44.77
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1702 3235
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2808 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1702 3235
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2808 3339
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 345

Compare specifications (specs)