Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 28% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 versus 149
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 versus 157.479
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 versus 0.864
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 versus 1 April 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 980 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 versus 149 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 versus 157.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 versus 0.864 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 15.68 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 19.2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 20
- 15.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 752.6 gflops versus 50 gflops
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 793 versus 630
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3866 versus 3210
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.392 versus 8.844
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.101 versus 10.385
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.77 versus 12.361
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1589 versus 988
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3235 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 versus 2808
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1589 versus 988
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3235 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 versus 2808
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 345 versus 194
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 400 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.68 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops versus 50 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 793 versus 630 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3866 versus 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 versus 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 versus 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 versus 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 versus 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 versus 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 versus 194 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 793 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 149 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 3866 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 9.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 157.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 0.864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 16.101 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 44.77 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 | 345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1359 | 1301 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 392 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 4600 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GTX
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5650
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 305M
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 530 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 510 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M435DX
