Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 106 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 vs 303
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 0.965
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 June 2013 vs 13 September 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 106 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 vs 303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 vs 0.965 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- 3.9x more core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 5x more texture fill rate: 25.1 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 192 vs 20
- 12x better floating-point performance: 601.3 gflops vs 50 gflops
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1323 vs 629
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4923 vs 3229
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.758 vs 8.844
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 302.509 vs 171.17
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.925 vs 10.385
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.656 vs 12.361
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 vs 988
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 vs 1702
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2808
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 vs 988
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 vs 1702
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2808
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1566 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 25.1 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 601.3 gflops vs 50 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1323 vs 629 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4923 vs 3229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 vs 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 302.509 vs 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.925 vs 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.656 vs 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 vs 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 vs 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 vs 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 vs 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 2808 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 629 | 1323 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 | 303 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3229 | 4923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi |
Code name | Haswell GT2 | GF106 |
Launch date | 3 June 2013 | 13 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1351 | 1137 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
Price now | $64.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 26.46 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1566 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 50 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 20 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 106 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.7 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |