Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 110 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

• 2.3x more core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 11.8x more texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s
• 38.4x more pipelines: 768 vs 20
• 28.5x better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 50 gflops
• 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 vs 630
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 314
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7900 vs 3210
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.168 vs 8.844
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 vs 171.17
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.141 vs 1.115
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.29 vs 10.385
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 47.404 vs 12.361
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 988
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 1702
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2808
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 988
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 1702
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 2808
• 4.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 881 vs 194

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	630 2527
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	314 416
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3210 7900
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.844 23.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	171.17 592.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.115 2.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.385 28.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.361 47.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1702 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2808 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1702 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2808 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 881

Compare specifications (specs)