Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 110 Watt
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 versus 9 October 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 110 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 928 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 59.2 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s
- 38.4x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 20
- 28.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,425 gflops versus 50 gflops
- 4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 versus 630
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 versus 314
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7900 versus 3210
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.168 versus 8.844
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 versus 171.17
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.141 versus 1.115
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.29 versus 10.385
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 47.404 versus 12.361
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 versus 988
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 versus 2808
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 versus 988
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 versus 2808
- 4.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 881 versus 194
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 928 MHz versus 400 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,425 gflops versus 50 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 versus 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 versus 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7900 versus 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 versus 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 versus 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 versus 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 versus 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 versus 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 versus 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 versus 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 versus 194 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 2527 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 416 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 7900 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 23.168 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 592.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 2.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 28.29 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 47.404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 | 881 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 | 9 October 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1359 | 846 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $169.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | 928 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops | 1,425 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | 59.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 392 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 4600 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GTX
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5650
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 305M
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 530 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 510 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M435DX
