Intel HD Graphics 500 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 500 and NVIDIA GeForce 310M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 500

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 9 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
  • 2.9x better floating-point performance: 144.0 gflops vs 48.96 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 14 Watt
  • 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 299 vs 113
  • 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 81 vs 23
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 10 January 2010
Texture fill rate 9 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 144.0 gflops vs 48.96 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 6 Watt vs 14 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 299 vs 113
PassMark - G2D Mark 81 vs 23

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310M

  • 7.7x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 16 vs 12
  • 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2949 vs 889
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1167 vs 1122
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1167 vs 1122
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1530 MHz vs 200 MHz
Pipelines 16 vs 12
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 2949 vs 889
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1167 vs 1122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1167 vs 1122

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 310M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
299
113
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
81
23
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
889
2949
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1122
1167
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1122
1167
Name Intel HD Graphics 500 NVIDIA GeForce 310M
PassMark - G3D Mark 299 113
PassMark - G2D Mark 81 23
Geekbench - OpenCL 889 2949
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 35.665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.215
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.987
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.154
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1122 1167
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1122 1167

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 500 NVIDIA GeForce 310M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 Tesla 2.0
Code name Apollo Lake GT1 GT218
Launch date 1 September 2015 10 January 2010
Place in performance rating 1645 1653
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 750 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 1530 MHz
Floating-point performance 144.0 gflops 48.96 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 12 16
Texture fill rate 9 GTexel / s 5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 6 Watt 14 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 260 million
CUDA cores 16
Gigaflops 73

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 10.1
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 GDDR3, DDR3
Shared memory 1 0
Memory bandwidth 12.64 GB / s

Technologies

Quick Sync
CUDA
HybridPower
Power management 8.0