Intel HD Graphics 5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 vs 254.345
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2013 vs 24 April 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 490.588 vs 254.345 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
- 4x more core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 9.6x more pipelines: 384 vs 40
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.932 vs 9.563
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1502 vs 713
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2167 vs 1103
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 1713
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1502 vs 713
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2167 vs 1103
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 1713
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 40 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.932 vs 9.563 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1502 vs 713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2167 vs 1103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1502 vs 713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2167 vs 1103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 1713 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 581 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3167 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.563 | 9.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 490.588 | 254.345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 713 | 1502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1103 | 2167 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1713 | 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 713 | 1502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1103 | 2167 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1713 | 3334 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.14 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.613 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.32 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Kepler |
| Code name | Haswell GT3 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1381 | 1382 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 40 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,270 million |
| Floating-point performance | 612.1 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 5000 with others
IntelHD Graphics 5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 330 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415M
IntelHD Graphics 5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 5000 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270
IntelHD Graphics 5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710A
IntelHD Graphics 5000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
