NVIDIA GeForce 910M vs Intel HD Graphics 5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 910M and Intel HD Graphics 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce 910M

Intel HD Graphics 5000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
3.9x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 200 MHz
9.6x more pipelines: 384 vs 40
Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 590 vs 587
Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1344 vs 713
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 1103
Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3020 vs 1713
Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1344 vs 713
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 1103
Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3020 vs 1713

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 27 May 2013
Core clock speed	775 MHz vs 200 MHz
Pipelines	384 vs 40
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	590 vs 587
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1344 vs 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2590 vs 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3020 vs 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1344 vs 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2590 vs 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3020 vs 1713

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000

A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 33 Watt
Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 224 vs 120
Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3139 vs 2629
Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.563 vs 6.448
3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 vs 155.993

Specifications (specs)
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	224 vs 120
Geekbench - OpenCL	3139 vs 2629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	9.563 vs 6.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	490.588 vs 155.993

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

590

587

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

120

224

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2629

3139

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.448

9.563

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

155.993

490.588

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1344

713

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2590

1103

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3020

1713

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1344

713

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2590

1103

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3020

1713

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 910M	Intel HD Graphics 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark	590	587
PassMark - G2D Mark	120	224
Geekbench - OpenCL	2629	3139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.448	9.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	155.993	490.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	12.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	27.733
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1344	713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2590	1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3020	1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1344	713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2590	1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3020	1713

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 910M	Intel HD Graphics 5000
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Generation 7.5
Code name	GF117	Haswell GT3
Launch date	18 August 2015	27 May 2013
Place in performance rating	1379	1381
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	775 MHz	200 MHz
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	384	40
Texture fill rate	12.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	1,300 million
Boost clock speed		1100 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Memory
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3
Shared memory	0	1
Technologies
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Quick Sync