Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Intel HD Graphics 5000

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and Intel HD Graphics 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1043 vs 587
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 242 vs 224
• Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 vs 3139
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 9.563
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 vs 713
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2227 vs 1713
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 vs 713
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 vs 1713

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000

• Around 67% higher pipelines: 40 vs 24
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 vs 273.504
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1103 vs 878
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1103 vs 878

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1043 587
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	242 224
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 3139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 9.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 490.588
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 1713

Compare specifications (specs)