Intel HD Graphics 5000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 5000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 versus 254.345
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2013 versus 24 April 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 490.588 versus 254.345 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
- 4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 797 MHz versus 200 MHz
- 9.6x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 40
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.932 versus 9.563
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1502 versus 713
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2167 versus 1103
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 versus 1713
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1502 versus 713
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2167 versus 1103
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 versus 1713
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz versus 200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 40 |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.932 versus 9.563 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1502 versus 713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2167 versus 1103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 versus 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1502 versus 713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2167 versus 1103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 versus 1713 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 581 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3167 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.563 | 9.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 490.588 | 254.345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 713 | 1502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1103 | 2167 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1713 | 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 713 | 1502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1103 | 2167 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1713 | 3334 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.14 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.613 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.32 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Haswell GT3 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 1381 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 40 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,300 million | 1,270 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 612.1 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.5 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.51 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 5000 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 330 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415M
IntelHD Graphics 5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 5000 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270
IntelHD Graphics 5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710A
IntelHD Graphics 5000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
