Intel HD Graphics 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5000 and NVIDIA Quadro K600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 41 Watt
  • Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3146 vs 1839
  • Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.563 vs 6.367
  • 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 vs 118.389
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2013 vs 1 March 2013
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 41 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 3146 vs 1839
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.563 vs 6.367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 490.588 vs 118.389

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K600

  • 4.4x more core clock speed: 876 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • 4.8x more pipelines: 192 vs 40
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 738 vs 584
  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 276 vs 225
  • Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1227 vs 713
  • Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1745 vs 1103
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2261 vs 1713
  • Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1227 vs 713
  • Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1745 vs 1103
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2261 vs 1713
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 876 MHz vs 200 MHz
Pipelines 192 vs 40
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 738 vs 584
PassMark - G2D Mark 276 vs 225
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1227 vs 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1745 vs 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2261 vs 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1227 vs 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1745 vs 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2261 vs 1713

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K600

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
584
738
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
225
276
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3146
1839
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9.563
6.367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
490.588
118.389
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
713
1227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1103
1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1713
2261
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
713
1227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1103
1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1713
2261
Name Intel HD Graphics 5000 NVIDIA Quadro K600
PassMark - G3D Mark 584 738
PassMark - G2D Mark 225 276
Geekbench - OpenCL 3146 1839
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.563 6.367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 490.588 118.389
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 713 1227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1103 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1713 2261
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 713 1227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1103 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1713 2261
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 7.921
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 9.393

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 5000 NVIDIA Quadro K600

Essentials

Architecture Generation 7.5 Kepler
Code name Haswell GT3 GK107
Launch date 27 May 2013 1 March 2013
Place in performance rating 1370 1371
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $199
Price now $78.99
Value for money (0-100) 11.66

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 876 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 40 192
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 41 Watt
Transistor count 1,300 million 1,270 million
Floating-point performance 336.4 gflops
Texture fill rate 14.02 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 160 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.3 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 Bit
Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.51 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1782 MHz
Memory type DDR3

Technologies

Quick Sync