Intel HD Graphics 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K600
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5000 and NVIDIA Quadro K600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 41 Watt
- Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3166 vs 1817
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.563 vs 6.367
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 vs 118.389
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 vs 1 March 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 41 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3166 vs 1817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.563 vs 6.367 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 490.588 vs 118.389 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K600
- 4.4x more core clock speed: 876 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 4.8x more pipelines: 192 vs 40
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 732 vs 587
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 vs 225
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1227 vs 713
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1745 vs 1103
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2261 vs 1713
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1227 vs 713
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1745 vs 1103
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2261 vs 1713
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 876 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 vs 40 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 732 vs 587 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 vs 225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1227 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1745 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2261 vs 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1227 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1745 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2261 vs 1713 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | NVIDIA Quadro K600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 587 | 732 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 277 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3166 | 1817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.563 | 6.367 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 490.588 | 118.389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 713 | 1227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1103 | 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1713 | 2261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 713 | 1227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1103 | 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1713 | 2261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.396 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.921 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.393 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 5000 | NVIDIA Quadro K600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Kepler |
Code name | Haswell GT3 | GK107 |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 1 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1371 | 1372 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $78.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.66 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 876 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 40 | 192 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 41 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,270 million |
Floating-point performance | 336.4 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 14.02 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |