NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M vs Intel HD Graphics 5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M and Intel HD Graphics 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• 3.9x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 200 MHz
• 2.4x more pipelines: 96 vs 40
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1263 vs 713
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2479 vs 1103
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3327 vs 1713
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1263 vs 713
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2479 vs 1103
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3327 vs 1713

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 585 vs 561
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 147
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3159 vs 2498
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.563 vs 2.692
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 vs 161.29

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	561 585
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	147 225
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2498 3159
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.692 9.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	161.29 490.588
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1263 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2479 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3327 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1263 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2479 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3327 1713

Compare specifications (specs)