NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M vs Intel HD Graphics 5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M and Intel HD Graphics 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 3.9x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 2.4x more pipelines: 96 vs 40
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1263 vs 713
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2479 vs 1103
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3327 vs 1713
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1263 vs 713
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2479 vs 1103
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3327 vs 1713
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 November 2013 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 40 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3327 vs 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3327 vs 1713 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 585 vs 560
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 226 vs 147
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3159 vs 2498
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.563 vs 2.692
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 vs 161.29
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 585 vs 560 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 vs 147 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3159 vs 2498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.563 vs 2.692 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 490.588 vs 161.29 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M | Intel HD Graphics 5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 560 | 585 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 147 | 226 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2498 | 3159 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.692 | 9.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.29 | 490.588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.55 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.858 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 | 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3327 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 | 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3327 | 1713 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | GF117 | Haswell GT3 |
Launch date | 27 November 2013 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1368 | 1370 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,300 million |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |