Intel HD Graphics 505 vs AMD Radeon HD 8210

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 505 and AMD Radeon HD 8210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 505

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1377 vs 655
• Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 95 vs 48
• Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 354 vs 187
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1635 vs 1611
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1635 vs 1611

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8210

• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 250 MHz
• 7.1x more pipelines: 128 vs 18
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1158 vs 956
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1158 vs 956

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 505
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8210

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1377 655
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	95 48
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	354 187
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1635 1611
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1635 1611
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	956 1158
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	956 1158

Compare specifications (specs)