Intel HD Graphics 505 vs NVIDIA GeForce 610M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 505 and NVIDIA GeForce 610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 505

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 79% better floating-point performance: 230.4 gflops vs 129.02 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 12 Watt
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 361 vs 292
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 1 December 2011
Floating-point performance 230.4 gflops vs 129.02 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 12 Watt
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 361 vs 292

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 610M

  • 2.7x more core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 250 MHz
  • Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • 2.7x more pipelines: 48 vs 18
  • Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1396 vs 1292
  • Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 113 vs 94
  • Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2848 vs 1635
  • Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2848 vs 1635
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1602 vs 956
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1602 vs 956
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 664 vs 470
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 664 vs 470
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 672 MHz vs 250 MHz
Boost clock speed 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
Pipelines 48 vs 18
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 1396 vs 1292
PassMark - G2D Mark 113 vs 94
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2848 vs 1635
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2848 vs 1635
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1602 vs 956
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1602 vs 956
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 664 vs 470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 664 vs 470

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 505
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 610M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1292
1396
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
94
113
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
361
292
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1635
2848
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1635
2848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
956
1602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
956
1602
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
470
664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
470
664
Name Intel HD Graphics 505 NVIDIA GeForce 610M
Geekbench - OpenCL 1292 1396
PassMark - G2D Mark 94 113
PassMark - G3D Mark 361 292
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1635 2848
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1635 2848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 956 1602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 956 1602
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 470 664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 470 664
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 104.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.27
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 5.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 9.69

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 505 NVIDIA GeForce 610M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 Fermi
Code name Apollo Lake GT1 GF108
Launch date 1 September 2015 1 December 2011
Place in performance rating 1532 1535
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 800 MHz 900 MHz
Core clock speed 250 MHz 672 MHz
Floating-point performance 230.4 gflops 129.02 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 18 48
Texture fill rate 14.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt 12 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 585 million
CUDA cores 48
Video decoders H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support PCI Express 2.0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12 API
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 DDR3
Shared memory 1 0
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
CUDA
Optimus