Intel HD Graphics 510 vs AMD Radeon R5 230

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and AMD Radeon R5 230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 2.3x more texture fill rate: 11.4 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 621 vs 222
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 902 vs 439
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1333 vs 992
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 902 vs 439
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1333 vs 992
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 3 April 2014
Texture fill rate 11.4 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 621 vs 222
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 902 vs 439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1333 vs 992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 902 vs 439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1333 vs 992

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230

  • 13.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 12
  • Around 10% better floating-point performance: 200.0 gflops vs 182.4 gflops
  • Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 255 vs 162
  • Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4127 vs 2381
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2480 vs 1786
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2480 vs 1786
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 160 vs 12
Floating-point performance 200.0 gflops vs 182.4 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 255 vs 162
Geekbench - OpenCL 4127 vs 2381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2480 vs 1786
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2480 vs 1786

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 230

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
621
222
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
162
255
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2381
4127
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
902
439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1333
992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1786
2480
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
902
439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1333
992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1786
2480
Name Intel HD Graphics 510 AMD Radeon R5 230
PassMark - G3D Mark 621 222
PassMark - G2D Mark 162 255
Geekbench - OpenCL 2381 4127
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.381
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 215.873
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 11.675
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 15.094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 902 439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1333 992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1786 2480
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 902 439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1333 992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1786 2480
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 510 AMD Radeon R5 230

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 TeraScale 2
Code name Skylake GT1 Caicos
Launch date 1 September 2015 3 April 2014
Place in performance rating 1509 1319
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R5 200 Series
Price now $50
Value for money (0-100) 6.10

Technical info

Boost clock speed 950 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz
Floating-point performance 182.4 gflops 200.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 12 160
Texture fill rate 11.4 GTexel / s 5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 19 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 370 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support PCIe 1.0 x4
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors N / A

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory type LPDDR3 / DDR4 DDR3
Shared memory 1
Memory bandwidth 10.67 GB / s

Technologies

Quick Sync
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
​PowerPlay