Intel HD Graphics 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• 3.4x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 950 MHz
• 3.8x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 11.4 GTexel / s
• 53.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 12
• 7.6x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 182.4 gflops
• 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 621
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 162
• 4.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 2381
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 14.381
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 215.873
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.081
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 11.675
• 8.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 15.094
• 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 902
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1333
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 1786
• 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 902
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1333
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 1786

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	621 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	162 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2381 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.381 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.873 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.081 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.675 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.094 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1333 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1786 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1333 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1786 3329

Compare specifications (specs)