Intel HD Graphics 520 vs AMD Radeon HD 8570M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and AMD Radeon HD 8570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 650 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 868 vs 441
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 211 vs 162
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2214
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2214
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 1 March 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 868 vs 441 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 vs 162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 2214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 2214 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570M
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4646 vs 4014
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1011 vs 951
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2059 vs 1462
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1011 vs 951
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2059 vs 1462
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4646 vs 4014 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1011 vs 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2059 vs 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1011 vs 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2059 vs 1462 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8570M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | AMD Radeon HD 8570M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 868 | 441 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 | 162 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4014 | 4646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 1011 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 2059 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 2214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 1011 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 2059 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 2214 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | AMD Radeon HD 8570M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | Sun |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 1 March 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1391 | 1319 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Floating-point performance | 528.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 16.5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 520 with others
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M320
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 615
