Intel HD Graphics 520 vs AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 800 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 90 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 951 vs 877
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 vs 1131
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2817
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 951 vs 877
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 vs 1131
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2817
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 17 February 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 90 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 vs 877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 vs 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 2817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 vs 877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 vs 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 2817 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
- Around 85% higher core clock speed: 554 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Core clock speed | 554 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 868 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4014 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 2817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 2817 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | Spectre |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 17 February 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1391 | 1394 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 554 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 90 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 2,410 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 520 with others
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M320
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 615
