Intel HD Graphics 520 vs AMD Radeon R5 M320
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and AMD Radeon R5 M320 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 855 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 867 vs 455
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 210 vs 140
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 12.564
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 867 vs 455 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 210 vs 140 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 vs 12.564 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M320
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5002 vs 3992
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1202 vs 951
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1202 vs 951
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 320 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5002 vs 3992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1202 vs 951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1202 vs 951 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M320
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | AMD Radeon R5 M320 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 867 | 455 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 210 | 140 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3992 | 5002 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 12.564 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 1202 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 1202 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 520 | AMD Radeon R5 M320 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT2 | Jet |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1394 | 1395 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 855 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 780 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 320 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Compute units | 5 | |
Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 17.1 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |