Intel HD Graphics 520 vs AMD Radeon R5 M320
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and AMD Radeon R5 M320 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 855 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 868 vs 444
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 211 vs 139
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 12.564
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 855 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 868 vs 444 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 vs 139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 vs 12.564 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M320
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5006 vs 4014
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1202 vs 951
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1202 vs 951
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5006 vs 4014 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1202 vs 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1202 vs 951 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M320
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | AMD Radeon R5 M320 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 868 | 444 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 | 139 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4014 | 5006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 12.564 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 1202 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 1202 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | AMD Radeon R5 M320 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | Jet |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1391 | 1392 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 320 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 17.1 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 520 with others
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M320
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 615
