Intel HD Graphics 520 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 868 vs 432
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 211 vs 92
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2417
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2417

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP

• 2.2x more core clock speed: 668 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	868 432
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	211 92
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 2417
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 2417

Compare specifications (specs)