Intel HD Graphics 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 866 vs 469
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 53
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 29 October 2007 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 866 vs 469 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 vs 53 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
- 5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4.7x more pipelines: 112 vs 24
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 112 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3337 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 866 | 469 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 53 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3990 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | G92 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 29 October 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1393 | 1391 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 112 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 112 | |
| Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 520 with others
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Go
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800 GT
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710A
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M320
