Intel HD Graphics 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 96 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 vs 477
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 44
- 47x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 0.465
- 11.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 vs 127
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 3161
- 11.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 vs 127
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 3161
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 21 February 2008 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 96 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 vs 477 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 vs 44 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 vs 0.465 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 vs 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 3161 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 vs 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 3161 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
- 5.4x more core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.7x more pipelines: 64 vs 24
| Core clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 64 vs 24 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 477 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 44 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 0.465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3161 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3161 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | G94 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 21 February 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1381 | 1587 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Price now | $39.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1625 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 64 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 96 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 208 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.8 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 520 with others
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelHD Graphics
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
