Intel HD Graphics 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce2 Go
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce2 Go videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 143 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 180 nm
- 512x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 64 MB
- 216.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 867 vs 4
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 210 vs 95
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 11 November 2000 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 143 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 180 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 64 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 867 vs 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 210 vs 95 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce2 Go
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 2 Watt vs 15 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 2 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce2 Go
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce2 Go |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 867 | 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 210 | 95 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3992 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce2 Go | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Celsius |
Code name | Skylake GT2 | NV11 B2 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 11 November 2000 |
Place in performance rating | 1394 | 1393 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 143 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 180 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 2 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 20 million |
Texture fill rate | 572 MTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 4x |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 5.31 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 332 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |