Intel HD Graphics 520 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 868 vs 370
• 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 211 vs 40
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2376
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2376

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

• Around 77% higher core clock speed: 530 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	868 370
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	211 40
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 2376
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 2376

Compare specifications (specs)