Intel HD Graphics 530 vs AMD Radeon HD 6450

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and AMD Radeon HD 6450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 750 MHz
• 5x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
• 2x better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
• 5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 198
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 119
• 6.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 vs 633
• 16.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 1.878
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 vs 97.327
• 7.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 0.231
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 vs 4.982
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.177 vs 19.314
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1045 vs 497
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 810
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1627
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1045 vs 497
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 810
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1627

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6450

• 6.7x more pipelines: 160 vs 24

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6450

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	995 198
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	254 119
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4397 633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.747 1.878
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	330.464 97.327
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.804 0.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.781 4.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.177 19.314
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 497
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 810
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 1627
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 497
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 810
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 1627

Compare specifications (specs)