AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs Intel HD Graphics 530

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and Intel HD Graphics 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 306 vs 253
• Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.006 vs 30.177
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1412 vs 1045
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1412 vs 1045
• Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 418 vs 382

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 994 vs 890
• Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4419 vs 3932
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 10.049
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 vs 183.156
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 0.75
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 vs 18.933
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 2111
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3174
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 2111
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3174

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	890 994
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	306 253
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3932 4419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.049 30.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	183.156 330.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.75 1.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.933 19.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	60.006 30.177
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1412 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2111 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3174 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1412 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2111 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3174 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	418 382

Compare specifications (specs)