Intel HD Graphics 530 versus NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA GeForce 840M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 530
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1124 MHz
- Environ 40% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.2 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 versus 150
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 versus 22.848
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 versus 162.594
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 versus 1.237
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 3191
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 3191
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1124 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 33 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 versus 150 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 versus 22.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 versus 162.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 versus 1.237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3191 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3191 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- 2.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 863.2 gflops versus 403.2 gflops
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1093 versus 997
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5748 versus 4382
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.15 versus 19.781
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.545 versus 30.177
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 versus 1045
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 versus 2393
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 versus 1045
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 versus 2393
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 503 versus 384
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops versus 403.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1093 versus 997 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5748 versus 4382 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 versus 19.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 versus 30.177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 versus 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 versus 2393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 versus 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 versus 2393 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 versus 384 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 997 | 1093 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 150 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4382 | 5748 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | 22.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | 162.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | 1.237 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | 21.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | 95.545 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | 2085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 2736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3191 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | 2085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 2736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3191 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 | 503 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | GM108 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1271 | 1273 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | 4 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2002 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 530 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5600 Ultra
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
AMDRadeon R5 235 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M350DX
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 3
