Intel HD Graphics 530 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- Around 57% better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 69 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 512 MB or 1 GB
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 501
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 46
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 1979
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1385
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 1979
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1385
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 17 November 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops vs 257.28 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 69 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 512 MB or 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 vs 501 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 vs 46 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 vs 1979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 1385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 vs 1979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 1385 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- 3.8x more core clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9236 vs 4397
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9236 vs 4397 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 | 501 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 46 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 | 9236 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 1979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 1385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 1979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 1385 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | GT215 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 17 November 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1394 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | |
| Price now | $37.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.27 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1340 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 257.28 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 69 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 727 million |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105C C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | DVIVGAHDMI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.2 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 512 MB or 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 530 with others
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 4000
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
AMDRadeon 620
