Intel HD Graphics 530 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

• 2.9x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
• 2.8x better floating-point performance: 1,111 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3337 vs 995
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 vs 254
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9306 vs 4397
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 vs 30.747
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 639.427 vs 330.464
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.341 vs 1.804
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 vs 19.781
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.814 vs 30.177
• 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 vs 1045
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 2393
• 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 vs 1045
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 2393
• 2.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1050 vs 384

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	995 3337
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	254 515
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4397 9306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.747 34.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	330.464 639.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.804 2.341
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.781 32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.177 69.814
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	384 1050

Compare specifications (specs)