Intel HD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon R5 M330

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R5 M330 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 620

AMD Radeon R5 M330

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 18 Watt
8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 vs 596
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 1155
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2691
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 1155
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2691

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 August 2016 vs 5 May 2015
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Texture fill rate	25.2 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 18 Watt
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	922 vs 596
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1404 vs 1155
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3340 vs 2691
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1404 vs 1155
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3340 vs 2691

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M330

3.2x more core clock speed: 955 MHz vs 300 MHz
13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
Around 63% better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 519 vs 216
Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5874 vs 4178
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.096 vs 30.288
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1850 vs 1733
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 vs 1733

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	955 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	320 vs 24
Floating-point performance	659.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	519 vs 216
Geekbench - OpenCL	5874 vs 4178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	69.096 vs 30.288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1850 vs 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1850 vs 1733

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M330

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

922

596

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

216

519

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4178

5874

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.288

69.096

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1404

1155

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1733

1850

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3340

2691

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1404

1155

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1733

1850

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3340

2691

Name	Intel HD Graphics 620	AMD Radeon R5 M330
PassMark - G3D Mark	922	596
PassMark - G2D Mark	216	519
Geekbench - OpenCL	4178	5874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	24.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	227.879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	30.288	69.096
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1404	1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1733	1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3340	2691
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1404	1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1733	1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3340	2691
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	343

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 620	AMD Radeon R5 M330
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 1.0
Code name	Kaby Lake GT2	Exo
Launch date	30 August 2016	5 May 2015
Place in performance rating	1334	926
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R5 300 Series
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	1030 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	955 MHz
Floating-point performance	403.2 gflops	659.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	24	320
Texture fill rate	25.2 GTexel / s	20.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	18 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	1,040 million
Compute units		5
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Mantle
OpenCL		Not Listed
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	64 bit
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4	DDR3
Shared memory	1	0
Memory bandwidth		14.4 GB / s
Memory clock speed		1000 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync
DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore