Intel HD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon R5 M330

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R5 M330 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1030 MHz
  • Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 18 Watt
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 vs 596
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 1155
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2691
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 1155
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2691
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 August 2016 vs 5 May 2015
Boost clock speed 1050 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Texture fill rate 25.2 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 18 Watt
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 922 vs 596
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1404 vs 1155
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 vs 2691
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1404 vs 1155
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 vs 2691

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M330

  • 3.2x more core clock speed: 955 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
  • Around 63% better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 519 vs 216
  • Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5874 vs 4178
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.096 vs 30.288
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1850 vs 1733
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 vs 1733
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 955 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 320 vs 24
Floating-point performance 659.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 519 vs 216
Geekbench - OpenCL 5874 vs 4178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 69.096 vs 30.288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1850 vs 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1850 vs 1733

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M330

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
922
596
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
216
519
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4178
5874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
30.288
69.096
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1404
1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1733
1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
2691
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1404
1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1733
1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
2691
Name Intel HD Graphics 620 AMD Radeon R5 M330
PassMark - G3D Mark 922 596
PassMark - G2D Mark 216 519
Geekbench - OpenCL 4178 5874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 227.879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 30.288 69.096
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1404 1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1733 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 2691
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1404 1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1733 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 2691
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 343

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 620 AMD Radeon R5 M330

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 1.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT2 Exo
Launch date 30 August 2016 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 1334 926
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R5 300 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz 1030 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 955 MHz
Floating-point performance 403.2 gflops 659.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 24 320
Texture fill rate 25.2 GTexel / s 20.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 18 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,040 million
Compute units 5

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 DDR3
Shared memory 1 0
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore