Intel HD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon R7 M445

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R7 M445 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 920 MHz
• Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 15-25 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 176
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.275 vs 15.765
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.508 vs 1.268
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 1853
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 1853

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M445

• 2.6x more core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
• Around 46% better floating-point performance: 588.8 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 939 vs 922
• Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5361 vs 4178
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 278.624 vs 227.879
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.335 vs 15.582
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 54.067 vs 30.288
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1913 vs 1404
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2138 vs 1733
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1913 vs 1404
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2138 vs 1733

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M445

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	922 939
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	216 176
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4178 5361
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.275 15.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	227.879 278.624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.508 1.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.582 24.335
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.288 54.067
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 2138
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 2138
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 1853

Compare specifications (specs)