Intel HD Graphics 620 vs ATI Radeon HD 5570

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and ATI Radeon HD 5570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 94% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 39 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 vs 478
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 198
• 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4178 vs 1370
• 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.275 vs 4.393
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.508 vs 0.454
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.582 vs 11.345
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 1160
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 1160

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5570

• 2.2x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 16.7x more pipelines: 400 vs 24
• Around 29% better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 235.572 vs 227.879
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.016 vs 30.288
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1883 vs 1733
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3340
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1883 vs 1733
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3340

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5570

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	922 478
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	216 198
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4178 1370
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.275 4.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	227.879 235.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.508 0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.582 11.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.288 49.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 1160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 1883
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 1160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 1883
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3360

Compare specifications (specs)