Intel HD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
• 7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 105 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 vs 463
• 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 49

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

• 5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 33.6 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• 4.7x more pipelines: 112 vs 24

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	922 463
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	216 49
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3346

Compare specifications (specs)