Intel HD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
• 9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 135 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 927 vs 564
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 vs 74

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

• 2.2x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 65% higher texture fill rate: 41.6 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• 5.3x more pipelines: 128 vs 24
• Around 3% better floating-point performance: 416.0 gflops vs 403.2 gflops

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	927 564
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	218 74
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3342

Compare specifications (specs)